Matthieu's editorial comments

Correction of Matthieu's editorial comments like typos and wording

MuMi_AT__MappingGuide__EN.qmd

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ lang: en
 ---
 
 # Introduction
-This is intended to serve as an introduction for the preparation of the geological mapping. The areas to be mapped are defined and a brief geological overview is presented. The study area is placed in a modern regional geological framework and the rocks most relevant for the mapping work are presented.
+This is intended to serve as an introduction for the preparation of the geological mapping at Hochfilzen site for MultiMiner project. The areas to be mapped are defined and a brief geological overview is presented. The study area is placed in a modern regional geological framework and the rocks most relevant for the mapping work are presented.
 
 As a base for a more in-depth familiarization, the explanations for sheet 122 Kitzbühl [@Heinisch2015] and especially the rich literature list there should be mentioned. A geological overview of the magnesite deposits near Hochfilzen is given by e.g. @Vavtar1976.
 
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Mentionable "sheet edge faults" between these sheets are not known in the study
 
 ## Questions
 The basic concern of the mapping work is the magnesite mineralization. Accordingly, the focus is on geological parameters that can be assumed to be relevant as evidence for magnesite mineralization processes. Important geological features include contacts to the adjacent rocks, differences in grain sizes, faults, \dots\
-It must not be ignored that the study area will be investigated in the course of this project, with methods of earth observation (EO) and remote sensing (RS) and the results of the mapping work will be linked with the findings of these methods. In this respect, the field work should also take into account what a satellite or drone "sees" and thus, for example, not only nice outcrops should be examined, but also weathered rock.
+It must be kept in mind that in the course of the MultiMiner project, the study area will be surveyed using spaceborne and drone-based Earth Observation (EO) methods, and the results of the mapping work will be linked to the results of these methods. In this respect, the field work should also take into account what a satellite or drone "sees" and thus, for example, not only nice outcrops should be examined, but also weathered rock.
 
 ## Issues
 At this point a few words about the practical field work and its preparation:
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ Access via the Schwarzleotal with parking possibility at the Leogang show mine.
 This region is on the eastern edge of map sheet 122. It is the area to the west and north around the Weißenstein open pit.
 
 ### Region 4
-This is an hiking area including the Blumenweg track and some via ferrata near the ridge in the north. Of great interest here is an outcrop of black dolomite and especially its contacts with the neighbouring rock. Furthermore, this is an area where the Glemmtal complex and the Hochhörndler complex are exposed and therefore more metabasites could be found here.
+This is a hiking area including the Blumenweg track and some via ferrata near the ridge in the north. Of great interest here is an outcrop of black dolomite and especially its contacts with the neighbouring rock. Furthermore, this is an area where the Glemmtal complex and the Hochhörndler complex are exposed and therefore more metabasites could be found here.
 
 ### Area 5
 Along the roughly west-east oriented "ridge" at the Lärchfilzkogel down to the Hörndlingergraben.\
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ Parking is possible at the Lärchfilzhochalm and in the Hördlingergraben.
 
 ## West Region
 The region is located directly at the western connection to Central Region and on map sheet 122. 
-This region is intended for model verification of earth observation (EO) and remote sensing (RS). The EO shall first provide indications of possible magnesite mineralization, which will subsequently be searched for.\
+This region is intended for model verification of spaceborne and drone-based Earth Observation (EO). The EO shall first provide indications of possible magnesite mineralization, which will subsequently be searched for.\
 This region is characterized by the Pletzerbach and its tributaries, the Lengfilzenbach and Grubalm with Sulztalbach.
 
 ### Area 6
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ Overall, the Spielberg dolomite group represents a shallow water facies close to
 ### Südfazies {#sec-suedfaz}
 A term that appears in the (older) literature is the so-called "Südfazies", which goes back to @Mavridis1969. He divides the carbonate rocks, in the area between Wörgl in the west and Bischofshofen in the east [@Haditsch1970], into two facies for the first time: the "northern facies" and the "southern facies". These two facies were describes as both lithologically and stratigraphically distinct and separated by a somewhat west-east oriented fault. @Mostler1970 also saw a "dolomite barrier" between the northern Spielberg dolomite and the Südfazies. The term Spielberg dolomite was introduced for the northern facies and its stratigraphic range was defined as Emsian to Eifelian (upper Lower Devonian to lower Middle Devonian). The southern facies has been defined as an association of distinct dolomites (stratigraphically ranging from footwall to hanging wall): black dolomite, light gray dolomite and red "Flaserdolomit", and light to dark gray coarse sparry dolomite. The stratigraphic range of these dolomites extends from the Younger Silurian (Ludlow) to the Upper Devonian [@Mavridis1969].\
 In the classification of the current map sheets [@Heinisch1995; @Heinisch2003] and the explanations [@Heinisch2015] the term "Südfazies" is no longer in use. Rather, parts of the "southern facies" were included in the Spielberg dolomite group and the black dolomite mentioned was assigned to the Dolomit-Kieselschiefer complex. The term "Südfazies" is also not found in the current (revised) stratigraphic table [@Hubmann2014], but is mentioned there as a synonym for some lithologies.\
-Consequently, the term "Südfazies" should also be avoided when working on this project. However, what can be relevant for the work here is the distinction of the different dolomites as reef and basin sediments (\ce{SiO2}-bearing dolomites, siliceous slate layers, \dots).
+Consequently, the term "Südfazies" should also be avoided when working on the MultiMiner project. However, what can be relevant for the work here is the distinction of the different dolomites as reef and basin sediments (\ce{SiO2}-bearing dolomites, siliceous slate layers, \dots).
 
 ## Slate
 In association with the Spielberg dolomite, alternating layers of slate occur occasionally. In the hanging wall of the platform dolomite, a smooth transition into these very fine clastic sediments can be observed. Due to the macroflora residues contained in this slate, its age can be narrowed down to the Upper Devonian or younger [@Heinisch2015].
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ Regarding the subvolcanic intrusives mentioned above, it should be noted that in
 
 ![Lithostratigraphic table of the Staufen-Höllengebirge nappe, from [@Heinisch2015]. Left: Wildseeloder complex with dolomites of the Spielberg dolomite group and the Dolomit-Kieselschiefer complex; Right: Glemmtal complex with basites; Center: Hochhörndler complex; Blasseneck Porphyroid is found in all units. Variscan tectonics and a Permomesozoic covering are also shown](Figs/Heinisch__2015__Erlaeuterungen__LithoStrat_Fig_7_p45.pdf){#fig-lithoStrat_StaufenHoellen_Heinisch}
 
-![Modern lithostratigraphic model of the Staufen-Höllengebirge nappe, modified after [@Huet2019; @Huet2022]; Green: new denotations, for the units according to @Heinisch2015 (@fig-lithoStrat_StaufenHoellen_Heinisch), following a modern lithostratigraphic resp. lithodemic nomenclature [@NACSN2005]. Detailed lithostratigraphy of each complex in @fig-litStrat_Wildseeloder-Cmplx, @fig-litStrat_Glemmtal-Cmplx, @fig-litStrat_Hochhoerndler-Cmplx](Figs/Huet_StaufenHoellengebirge_Nappe/Huet__StaufenHoellengebirge_Nappe.pdf){#fig-LithStratModel_StaufenHoellen_Huet}
+![Modern lithostratigraphic model of the Staufen-Höllengebirge nappe, modified after [@Huet2019; @Huet2022]; Green: proposed new denotations, for the units according to @Heinisch2015 (see @fig-lithoStrat_StaufenHoellen_Heinisch), following a modern lithostratigraphic resp. lithodemic nomenclature [@NACSN2005]. Detailed lithostratigraphy of each complex in @fig-litStrat_Wildseeloder-Cmplx, @fig-litStrat_Glemmtal-Cmplx, @fig-litStrat_Hochhoerndler-Cmplx](Figs/Huet_StaufenHoellengebirge_Nappe/Huet__StaufenHoellengebirge_Nappe__NewTerminology.pdf){#fig-LithStratModel_StaufenHoellen_Huet}
 
 ![Lithostratigraphy of the Wildseeloder complex, modified after [@Huet2019; @Huet2022]](Figs/Huet_StaufenHoellengebirge_Nappe/Huet__Wildseeloder_Cmplx.pdf){#fig-litStrat_Wildseeloder-Cmplx}
 
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ Lithology numbers (59 | 55) in sheet (122 | 123)
 >
 >[...]
 >
->The lion's share of pyroclastics is found in the fine fraction (coarse ash to fine ash tuff). These occure today as dull green to blue-green appearing volcanic slates. They make up the main part of the outcrop area, for example at the end of the Glemmtal valley or along the Pass-Thurn-Straße south of Jochberg. As a rule, they show clear foliation; parts that occasionally appear more massive represent former coarse ash tuffs and are easily confused with layered lava flows. Microscopically, the mineral composition is poorly resolvable. It is a fine felt of chlorite, epidote, albite and occasionally calcite. Fine pigmentation by opaque minerals is the rule. Phenocrystal relics are almost always metamorphically altered."
+>The lion's share of pyroclastics is found in the fine fraction (coarse ash to fine ash tuff). These occur today as dull green to blue-green appearing volcanic slates. They make up the main part of the outcrop area, for example at the end of the Glemmtal valley or along the Pass-Thurn-Straße south of Jochberg. As a rule, they show clear foliation; parts that occasionally appear more massive represent former coarse ash tuffs and are easily confused with layered lava flows. Microscopically, the mineral composition is poorly resolvable. It is a fine felt of chlorite, epidote, albite and occasionally calcite. Fine pigmentation by opaque minerals is the rule. Phenocrystal relics are almost always metamorphically altered."
 
 ### Gabbroid dykes
 

_quarto.yml

@@ -14,6 +14,9 @@ author:
   - name: Holger Paulick
     affiliation:
       - ref: gsa
+  # - name: Ben Huet
+  #   affiliation:
+  #     - ref: gsa
 
 date: today
 
@@ -32,6 +35,7 @@ format:
       date-space-after: 0.5cm
     pdf-engine: pdflatex
     documentclass: scrreprt
+    classoption: ["oneside", "open=any"]
     papersize: a4
     fontsize: 11pt
     geometry: [left=25mm, right=25mm, top=2cm, bottom=2cm]

_variables.yml

@@ -1 +1 @@
-VERSION: 2.0
+VERSION: 3