(Submitter): "Release your dataset for the editor" "no preferred reviewer" should be preset if possible #23

Closed
opened 2024-02-28 10:41:33 +00:00 by haivik · 3 comments
Member

Due to we do not have a real review-workflow implemented yet, we should not allow the submitter a choice here.

Due to we do not have a real review-workflow implemented yet, we should not allow the submitter a choice here.
haivik added the
L
enhancement
labels 2024-02-28 10:41:33 +00:00
kaiarn was assigned by haivik 2024-02-28 10:41:33 +00:00
haivik added this to the (deleted) project 2024-02-28 10:41:34 +00:00
Member

Now "no preferred reviewer" was made the predefined option by Arno, but I would suggest that this appears at the left of the "preferred reviewer", in harmony with the reading direction of western users. Also a slight separation between both texts could help with readability.

Now "no preferred reviewer" was made the predefined option by Arno, but I would suggest that this appears at the left of the "preferred reviewer", in harmony with the reading direction of western users. Also a slight separation between both texts could help with readability.
porfra changed title from Submitter: "Release your dataset for the editor" "no preferred reviewer" should be preset if possible to (Submitter): "Release your dataset for the editor" "no preferred reviewer" should be preset if possible 2024-07-17 13:35:25 +00:00
porfra added this to the Iteration 1: All "Enhancements" are solved milestone 2024-07-17 14:07:31 +00:00
Owner

Is the following solution suitable for you?

grafik

**Is the following solution suitable for you?** ![grafik](/attachments/430aa240-d1f1-498d-a618-7b99b1a44cf5)
Member

Great! many thanks Arno!

Great! many thanks Arno!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No project
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: geolba/tethys.backend#23
No description provided.